MSP Phone Number Is- 517-332-2521 - CALL them to say that you don't want lying cops on our streets like Koedy Dole.

The Michigan Supreme Court, as well as the US DOJ Civil Rights Division and others have been notified of the following:

(See letter at bottom)

There are several US Supreme Court decisions which have been violated by Prosecutor Ryan Ziegler in protecting Koedy Dole and not correcting his perjury now that it is known, and Koedy Dole is guilty of felony perjury in court and perjury on a search warrant affidavit.

In the Michigan Supreme Court -

First it must be known that MSP has disappeared the dash cam footage from the night of the seizure in its entirety. The dash cam footage which was given to the defense in discovery has the entire several minute beginning deleted which doesn't align with the false narrative that MSP has put forth in this case. In fact all of the video submitted in discovery has been edited by MSP.

• Brenner v Kolk, 226 Mich App 149 (1997): Established that the duty to preserve evidence exists even before an action has commenced if litigation is anticipated.

• Triggering the Duty: The obligation to preserve evidence arises when a party has notice that

  evidence is relevant to potential or actual litigation.

• If police hide or destroy dash cam footage, it is considered spoliation of evidence, which is very serious. In court, this destruction can allow a judge to use the adverse inference rule.

Secondly, MSP has deleted a material spoken sentence from the BWC that the trooper declared during the seizure which would raise doubt that he had probable cause when he first began to attempt to seize. The soundtrack editing process has also been described by other police departments that use Motorola BWC's including but not limited to the Grand Junction, Colorado police department, and I briefly described in a video on my YouTube channel.

MSP Trooper Koedy Dole committed not only felony perjury on a search warrant affidavit with absolute motive to do so, but then committed perjury on the stand during my evidentiary hearing, grossly altering the facts and chronology of events during both the seizure AND the in-cruiser interview cam. Kalkaska County attorney Tom Seger failed to correct it or even request that the video be played in court. The prosecutor then either took it upon himself to type the false and misleading brief that he filed with the Court of Appeals, or was negligent in simply quoting the troopers false testimony that the camera footage doesn't support.

• People v. Lively, 470 Mich 248 (2004): The Michigan Supreme Court clarified that the statutory definition of perjury includes any willfully false statement made under oath, regardless of whether it is material to the case.

• People v. Morris, 77 Mich App 567 (1971) & People v. Lester, 232 Mich App 262 (1998):

  These cases establish that knowledge of perjury by police officers can be imputed to prosecutors, aligning with US Supreme Court precedent in Giglio v. United states.

• False Testimony and Evidence: The Michigan Supreme Court has vacated convictions and ordered new trials when prosecutors allowed false testimony to stand uncorrected or actively prevented truthful evidence from being presented.

In the United States Supreme Court -

In a recent SCOTUS case, Glossip v Oklahoma 2025, SCOTUS ruled against the state based on its violation of Napue v. Illinois (1959), stating "knowing use of false testimony by a prosecutor in a criminal case violates the Due Process Clause"

"The same result obtains when the State, although not soliciting false evidence, allows it to go uncorrected when it appears". Alcorta v. Texas, 355 U. S. 28; United States ex rel. Thompson v. Dye,221 F.2d 763; United States ex rel. Almeida v. Baldi, 195 F.2d 815; United States ex rel. Montgomery v. Ragen.

SCOTUS goes on to write, The estimate of the truthfulness and reliability of a given witness may well be determinative of guilt or innocence, and it is upon such subtle factors as the possible interest of the witness in testifying falsely that a defendant's life or liberty may depend. As also stated by the New York Court of Appeals in a case very similar to this one, People v. Savvides

Trooper Koedy Dole absolutely had motive to lie because his job was on the line because he was probationary at the time of the seizure and the perjury on the warrant affidavit.)

Brady v. Maryland states that suppression of exculpatory evidence or presentation of false or misleading evidence is a constitutional violation.

Brady v. Maryland declares that prosecutors must turn over any evidence favorable to the accused. That includes anything in the hands of police departments. Such as full and unedited and UN-DISAPPEARED dash cam footage which MSP had a duty to preserve. Brenner v Kolk, 226 Mich App 149 (1997)

Giglio v. United States declares in part that failing to disclose is the case, even if the failure to disclose was a matter of negligence and not intent.

Franks v. Delaware (1978), a Supreme Court of the United States case applied in Michigan, a defendant is entitled to a hearing if they make a substantial preliminary showing that an affidavit for a search warrant contains a false statement made knowingly, intentionally, or with reckless disregard for the truth. If the false statement is necessary to the finding of probable cause, the warrant is voided and evidence suppressed.

• The Franks Hearing: If a defendant proves the false statement was essential to the finding of probable cause, a hearing is required. If the allegation of perjury is established by a preponderance of the evidence, the search warrant is voided and fruits of the search are excluded.

• Reckless Disregard Standard: It is not enough to show that information was omitted or inaccurate; the defendant must prove the officer acted with reckless disregard for the truth.

Koedy Dole was probationary at the time of his perjury on a search warrant affidavit. His job was on the line and he absolutely had motive to lie about the birth year of "R.T." (the scam artist from Grand Rapids). In the BWC footage you can hear him declare that he was aware that I thought she was born in 2002. ALL of the text evidence shows that she told me she was born in 2002. The in-cruiser interview cam also repeatedly shows the discussion about the evidence showing she was born in 2002 and was an adult. However, Koedy Dole showed up in front of the local Magistrate (the Sheriff's wife) and swore an oath and presented a search warrant affidavit in which he wrote that I believed she was born in 2006. This was a very important material statement on the warrant affidavit which he knew wasn't true and which served to claim that I was knowingly receiving photos by an underage person. Surely reckless considering the search could violate the 4th Amendment. He lied intentionally, because 5 days had passed since the seizure and his Post Commander was notified of the illegal seizure by ME as well as by Kalkaska County Sgt Kevin Schaub the day after the seizure took place and 4 days before he lied on the warrant affidavit. So he knew he was in trouble before he committed perjury on the warrant affidavit.

Liability for Perjury: While police officers generally have absolute immunity for testimony at trial, Briscoe v. LaHue (1983) distinguished police testimony at trial from pretrial actions, and subsequent interpretations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 often allow for liability when officers create false, foundational documents like affidavits.

In a recorded conversation in which he acknowledged he was aware I was recording, attorney Michael Horowitz claims that "Police lie constantly, and prosecutors and judges enable it quite frequently." It's shocking that the above strongly held case law doesn't seem to apply in Kalkaska County or to the Michigan State Police, or this local dishonest prosecutor.

Also, warning, the disgraceful Michigan State 'Trooper' Koedy Dole is still on the street and hasn't been fired by the State of Michigan for his felony perjury. Any case he is involved with should be severely scrutinized and your attorney can refer back to what he did here in Kalkaska County when he's under cross-examination in your case, because once a dirtbag lying cop... always a dirtbag lying cop.

"Oh... well you lied your ass off in 46th Circuit Court in the Evans case didn't you Trooper Dole? Well then how do we know you aren't lying your ass off in this courtroom right now Trooper Dole? You seem to have a big problem with committing perjury to save your own ass don't you Trooper Dole?"

Catch my drift * wink *

This is how MSP 'Trooper' Koedy Dole lies, and the SCOTUS case law and Mich Supreme Court case law he readily violates while prowling our streets. This cop needs to be fired!

(But the Michigan State Police seems to allow this)